

Why is it that
conventional wisdom is so often wrong?
Perhaps part of it is because we are
intellectually lazy, and it is just easier to defer to the voices of the loudest—especially if they are saying something we want to be true.

But, I just wish I had a
dollar in my
thong for every time I've heard a pundit, anchor, commentator, politician, expert panelist or the
President of the United States say that all
economists, regardless of their political or ideological persuasion, agrees that the
federal government must undertake a massive
stimulus package inorder to kick start the
economy out of the doldrums.
If I did, I would be able to personally
bailout the
economy—even though this
conventional wisdom is laughably inaccurate.
But, nonetheless it is taken as a matter of faith that this is the consensus of all
economists.
Barack Obama
repeatedly says:
“There is no disagreement that we need action by our government, a recovery program that will help to jumpstart the economy.”This
is simply not true—and that does not mean the only naysayers are partisan
Republican hacks or hired guns.

On
Wednesday
there was a
full page ad
in the
New York Times, paid for by the
CATO Institute, signed by two hundred
academic economists who respectfully disagree.
Three of them are
Nobel Laureates, but are not media darlings like
Paul Krugman:
Edward C. Prescott is Chairman of the Department of Economics at Arizona State University, and won the
2004 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences for two important papers that advanced the field of dynamic macroeconomics.
Vernon L Smith
is a Professor of Economics and Law at
George Mason University, and won the
2002 Nobel Prize in Economics for having established laboratory experiments as a tool in empirical economic analysis, especially in the study of alternative market mechanisms .
James M. Buchanan is currently Advisory General Director of the Center for Study of Public Choice, Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Economics, Board of Visitors, President, and Faculty
George Mason University , and University Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Economics and Philosophy at
Virginia Polytechnic.
Dr. Buchanan won the
1986 Nobel Prize in Economics for his work in
public choice economic theory.

You really do need to get out the
hip waders with the
BS that is being spewed out about the need for this emergency
nine hundred billion dollar stimulus package.
What really makes me need a stiff drink, is that there
is not one single instance of an
economy being kick started out of a
recession through
government spending.
Paul Krugman even admits this—albeit he says that
FDR's New Deal was unsuccessful
because it was not big enough.
In fact the truth is that all this
Keynesian theory stuff had been pretty
much discredited by
economists until its resurrection by
Democratic politicians in the last six months.
John Cochrane, a professor at the
University of Chicago ,
says that among academics over the last 30 years, the idea of
fiscal stimulus has been discredited and in graduate courses, it is
"taught only for its fallacies.”
New York University
economist Thomas Sargent
agrees:
‘The calculations that I have seen supporting the stimulus package are back-of-the-envelope ones that ignore what we have learned in the last 60 years of macroeconomic research.”Now, some of this
spending is good for providing a
safety net until the
economy gets back on track—but we should not pretend that it is an
economic stimulus that is going to rocket us back to those
glorious spendthrift days of the
George W. Bush administration.
But despite what
Paul Krugman and
Barack Obama believe,
it is no free lunch. If massive
government spending grows the economy, then we should all be millionaires after eight years of
George W. Bush.
While it is true that
jobs will be created by the
government spending, as usual the
government is hopelessly inefficient.
Using the administration's own figures it will cost the
government
$187,000 to create a single job.
That is not a real good
bang for the
buck.

Related Articles: