That judicial presumption of naiveness doesn’t protect Sandusky from the rigors of journalistic questioning, a mark which Costas and Brian Williams underscored repeatedly. In an converse that was implausibly severe to concentrate to, Sandusky’s replies to Costas’ continual sceptical reeked of sophistication and untruth, and in one happening, a state by sick, dissentious forgoing.
When Costas asked him afterward if he is sexually attracted to saxist boys, young boys, Sandusky replied...
Read Full Story