

It's always a good idea to take these, usually government funded,
studies with a copious measure of salt. But just the same, it is real nice to be vindicated.
An
Ohio State study found that
conservatives are more likely to read opposing views, than are so-called "
liberals." (a word leftists and progressives
hijacked during the New Deal and then proceeded to change its meaning).
It is the same conclusion reached in the book
I Can’t Believe I’m Sitting Next to a Republican.
Liberals are often surprised to find that
conservatives tend to know their thinking, but they don't understand
conservatism—and are generally clueless when it comes to
libertarianism. I remember how
Barack Obama, in one of his prime time press conferences, expressed amazement that there were still people who did not believe that
Roosevelt's New Deal ended the
Great Depression. The truth
is that virtually all
economists, including
liberals like
Paul Krugman, admit this.
Many of my
leftist friends are shocked to learn that, unlike many of them, I have actually read
Das Kapital and the
Communist Manifesto—as well as
President Audacity's hymns to himself---and even read
blogs like
Moveon.org
on a regular basis.
The history of
this blog
certainly supports the finding tha
t conservatives are more
open-minded than
liberals. In the three years I have been publishing this
blog the core readership has been
conservatives, even though it is written by
a lesbian who has always strongly opposed the
Iraq War,
Patriot Act and
War Commissions Act—and strongly supports
same sex marriage and the
legalization of marijuana.
Nonetheless
conservative guys like
MK Freeberg and
KURU have been long time readers. And the
blog
was saved from oblivion by readers like
Tigerhawk and the support of
Pajama Media, when some of my detractors were able to, in some inscrutable manner, get
Google to designate the
blog as a pornographic site.
We used to have
liberals and
feminists around here—they liked it when the topic often drifted to the follies of
George Bush. But since he doesn't matter anymore, I scarcely mention him. And they are quite offended that I frequently point out there is now a man in the
White House who is a much bigger threat to
liberty, and
America as I understand and love it, than was the other guy. And I suppose it makes them uncomfortable when I mention that
Barack Obama has not taken any significant steps to undo those things which troubled me most about
George Bush.
Just like a local chapter of the
National Organization of Women 86'd me for believing that
abortion is a bit yuckier than spilling pea soup,
feminists, like
Womanist Musings, no longer stop by. A lot of
feminists didn't like it when I
thought out loud how maybe they should speak up on the
misogynistic treatment of
Sarah Palin, even if they didn't like her, or her politics—after all, I
stood up for
Hillary Clinton.
Gay and
lesbian activists (with a few notable exceptions
) want nothing to do with me. Perhaps they don't like hearing that
Barack Obama
has done nothing that he has promised
gays and
lesbians, and has the same viewpoint on
gay marriage as does Carrie Prejean --while
Dick Cheney is actually on their side, and
George Bush's solicitor general
has filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of
Proposition 8.
It is just difficult to learn much when you only read stuff you already agree with, and apparently, according to the
Ohio State study, that is what most
liberals do.
And when you are ignorant, it is inevitable that you are wrong a whole lot of the time, and it is uncomfortable when this is pointed out.
So avoidance is the best policy.

Related Articles: