GARART POLITICAL NEWS

GARART POLITICAL NEWS

Look at important local races from around the country.

The Inside Skinny on Campaign Cash

A political campaign contains many elements absent public scrutiny. Opinion polls, pandering to this or that special interest group, focus groups. Other methods of course include television ads both bio spots and later attack ads. There purpose is to define and protect their candidate. Lastly, and probably the most important component of every campaign is a well-tuned fundraising and field operation.

What pays for all this? The answer is obvious—fundraising. The fleece starts at the beginning of a campaign and continues throughout. The office seeker “dials for dollars.”

Fundraisers are also part of raising money. These events are political auditions. They give potential donors a chance to see the candidate up close and personal. Another aspect of a fundraiser is bundling contributions. What’s known as the “backdoor-PAC.” While, for example, candidate Obama has refused to take PAC money, he has received contributions from certain special interest via this technique.

Another element of fundraising is the use of the “polling memorandum”. Yesterday, such a memorandum was released by the shill group Democracy Corp run by James Carville and pollster Stan Greenberg. The entirety of the memo appears below.

The memo purports to be an analysis based on four Greenberg polls. Its’ findings—the 2008 election will be a landslide for Democrats. They will win every race from the local courthouse to the White House.

The purposes of these documents are also to aid fundraising. Copies are distributed to: Corporate PAC directors, labor unions and other special interest groups, the Naught Estate and political operatives.

The process stories of X having more cash-on-hand than Y is an easy story to write. It is a major factor in the determination of candidate viable. This turns elections into process coverage rather than a debate on public policy questions, which demeans elections turning them into sporting events—the Reds versus the Blues or the Dodger v. the Yankees.

The majority of political reporters believe it’s this kind of coverage the voters want. These findings have been contradicted by the Pew Foundation, Poynter Foundation, (owner of Florida’s Saint Petersburg Times) and other meaningful organizations committed to the analysis of news content and the type of coverage sought by readers.

Every viable candidate for public office has a polling memorandum. Why not call your local and presidential candidates and ask for three documents: their most recent polling memorandum, a copy of a statement that answers the question, why are you running? Lastly, a copy of the campaign’s fundraising targets, no doubt the reply to these requests will be “such documents are proprietary.” Your reply: It is the voters right to know and every campaign should be transparent.

Opinion polls are snapshots in time. Today voters may believe x issue concerns them most, while fourteen months from now y might be the crucial determination in how they cast their ballot.

Drop me a quick email detailing the responses you receive, if you make such inquiries.

Lastly, it has been rumored for many years that Senator John McCain is a wife abuser and alcoholic. If anyone has heard such a rumor, witnessed certain actions that might confirm this rumor please send an email that describes the circumstances. Anonymity is assured. Email: garart1@gmail.com

10 G STREET, NE SUITE 400  WASHINGTON, DC 20002

Date: August 13, 2007

To: Friends of Democracy Corps

From: Stan Greenberg

THE CONTOURS OF THE NEW ELECTORATE

Special Report on the Democracy Corps Database

At important turning points, we like to pause and look at the whole database of surveys

conducted by Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner – focusing in particular on the

4,000 interviews conducted during the last four months. There are big changes here that have an

enduring quality, with the opportunity to shape the parties’ prospects in 2008.

Right now, the Democrats enjoy an average lead of 12 points in the generic presidential

race (51 to 39 percent) and 9 points in the named congressional ballot (51 to 42 percent). But let

us point to some of the trends underneath that make 2008 look like a very big election.

The Democrats’ lead in both the Presidential and Congressional races is undiminished in

the ‘core’ group of the most likely voters. Usually, the Republicans cut some of the

margin on Election Day because of turnout patterns, but that is not likely in 2008.

Education – one of the best predictors of vote over the past decade – is losing its power,

with both well-educated and blue collar voters moving to the Democrats. In the

Congressional ballot, for example, the high school educated give the Democrat an 11-

point lead, dropping to 10 points among those with some high school and 8 points among

the college educated. In short, the rush to be done with the Republicans is turning

America a little classless.

The ‘opinion elite’ in the country – those with a college education and earning more than

$75,000 – are supporting the Democratic presidential candidate by 11 points (52 to 41

percent). The elites are apparently fed up with the state of the country under George

Bush.

While the Democratic Presidential candidate is winning the Kerry counties by a two-toone

margin, the Republican candidate is only winning the Bush counties by 1 point (46 to

45 percent). The Republican nominee will struggle to come back in the battleground

states. Just as important, a lot of Republican incumbents will be running in supposedly

‘red’ districts and states, but find them evenly divided. The Republican Presidential

candidate is barely ahead among white rural voters (48 to 41 percent).

Contours of the New Electorate

The Democratic Presidential candidate is carrying those with family members serving in

Iraq by almost the same margin as for voters overall, 50 to 43 percent. Democratic

Congressional candidates who have been prominently trying to change Iraq policy have

an even larger lead, 53 to 42 percent.

The Democratic Presidential candidate is carrying all Catholics by 18 points and white

Catholics by 13 (51 to 38 percent). This would represent a major change in political

direction. In fact, the Democrat is running marginally ahead among white Catholics who

attend Church every week.

The big difference in the race is independents: Presidentially, Democrats are ahead by 19

points; Congressionally, by 14 points. It is the crash with independents more than

Republican defections that is driving the Republican vote down.

The Democrats are getting landslide margins with voters under 30; they are even winning

whites under 30 by 14 points.

Instead of losing younger white non-college men by 19 points as in 2004, the Democratic

Presidential candidate now is losing them by only 2.

Union voters have not in recent decades been as solid for the Democrats as now. In fact,

Democrats are winning white union households by two-to-one.

One of the key blocs of ‘swing’ voters is married women. They are breaking marginally

for the Democrats this year after swinging strongly for the Republicans in 2004. White

married women are breaking even in the Presidential, and Congressionally, the

Republican candidate is ahead by only 4 points.

One of the key blocs of ‘base’ voters for Democrats is unmarried women – who could

comprise a quarter of the electorate. The Democrats are winning them by two to one;

they are winning white unmarried women by over 20 points.

Boiler Plate on Democracy Corp

Democracy Corps is an independent, non-profit organization dedicated to making the government of the United States more responsive to the American people. It is led by James Carville and Stanley Greenberg, who founded Democracy Corps in 1999. Democracy Corps provides free public opinion research and strategic advice to those dedicated to a more responsive Congress and Presidency.

The organization was born out of outrage over the impeachment of President Clinton when the leadership in Congress preferred radical partisanship to addressing the issues which really matter to American families. Following the 2000 election, Democracy Corps rededicated itself after the presidential candidate with the most votes and the most popular policy agenda did not become the President of the United States.


Sponsors
Comments
Be the first to leave a comment!
Add a Comment:
Already a member? Log In
Sponsors
About the Author

14 Kudos
Top Politics Articles
Noonan, Murphy trash Palin on hot mike: “It’s over”
Two pundits get real on a mic that should be off.
John McCain Checks Out Sarah Palin's Butt In Video
Does he or doesn't he? Watch the video and judge for yourself.
Levi Johnston Tattoo Shows Devotion to Bristol Palin
His ring finger says 'Bristol.' Maybe Levi is in this for real.
More From Zimbio
Copyright © 2008 - Zimbio, Inc. Some rights reserved.