What He Said! Professor Ward Churchill, Adolf Eichmann, Hannah Arendt, And The Roosting Chickens Of Genocide

Also: What he says.

A current interview @ NewsWeek:

INT: “But how can you possibly compare the victims of 9/11 to that of a man shipping the gold fillings from murdered Jews?

WC: Those (9/11 victims) who were engaged in the international-financial operations, which were the motive cause for U.S. policy … in full knowledge of what effects were on juvenile populations, sweatshops, and so forth—that’s the anchor there. Implement policy for profit, to maximize profit, to increase dividends, blah, blah, blah. Which also, by the way, increases their commission, establishes their stature, leads to their promotion trajectory, leads to their quality of life, and in full knowledge—they may suppress it—of the carnage that is induced in this profit-maximization profile.

…Basically, I said you are accountable for what you do in the world. And … if you are profiting from carnage … you are the moral and philosophical equivalent of Adolf Eichmann. You don’t like that, change the behavior. That’s not who you want to be, stop acting like that.

INT: So the behavior of every 9/11 victim is a moral equivalency to Eichmann’s support of the Holocaust?

WC: I don’t know. Why don’t you ask what the moral equivalency would be of the half-million Iraqi children that died in Iraq from U.S. sanctions?

[Read More]

Let’s cut to the chase and REALLY analyze the content & context of his ‘notorious’ remark about the victims of the World Trade Center attacks.

From ToTheCenter:

Ward Churchill’s paper trod on sacrosanct ground. We have been told by politicians, media pundits, and clerygmen that the terrorists who attacked the United States on September 11 “hate us because we’re free.” That is baloney. Al Qaeda is certainly a terrorist organization, but it is not a nihilist group. In fact, there is no point in committing acts of terror if you do not hope to gain from them. Like the Irish Republican Army, Hamas, and the political anarchists of fin-de-siècle Europe, al Qaeda is an organization of political terrorists with political goals.

What Did Ward Churchill Actually Say?

by Michael S. Leonard

Ward Churchill, the Colorado professor who sparked national controversy with a 2001 essay characterizing the victims…

…of the September 11 terrorist attacks as “Little Eichmanns,” was fired by the University of Colorado on Tuesday.

I will not discuss at any length the merits of his argument, which pertains to the most loaded, sacred, and taboo topic of the 21st century United States, and I will not tell anyone what to think. However, without either defending or ostracizing Professor Churchill, I do feel compelled to dispell the blatant mischaracterizations of the essay in question that have become prevalent in the days since his firing.

Mr. Churchill did not “call the victims of September 11 Nazis,” as one recent article on ToTheCenter asserted. That is not only a misinterpretation; it is an allegation that does not stand up to the most elementary fact-check. He made an analogy, and the fact that his remarks have been taken so literally is proof enough that the SAT’s recent removal of the “Analogies” section was misguided.

Furthermore, characterizing Adolf Eichmann merely as someone “who helped carry out the Holocaust,” while technically accurate, misses the point entirely.

This cursory treatment of the topic ill serves the discourse. It is impossible to know whether you agree with Professor Churchill or, in fact, whether he is “an anti-American socialist lunatic,” as one commenter recently described him, if you don’t know what he actually said or what he meant by it.

Adolf Eichmann was a Nazi bureaucrat eventually assigned to manage the logistics of mass deportation and execution that lay at the heart of the Nazi “Final Solution,” as the extermination of Europe’s Jews was officially termed. He escaped to Argentina after the war and was eventually arrested (in 1961) by Israeli intelligence agents, who transported him to Jerusalem for trial on charges of war crimes.

In Jerusalem, Eichmann adopted the “only following orders” defense that had failed so many of his superiors at the Nuremberg trials 15 years earlier. After colleagues sent highly incriminating depositions from Germany and Austria, many of which portrayed Eichmann as an overzealous careerist who frequently went above and beyond his “orders” in the hopes of impressing Nazi superiors, Eichmann was convicted and hanged.

Hannah Arendt, a reporter whose coverage of the trial formed the basis for her book, Eichmann in Jerusalem, turned the case study into a landmark thesis of political philosophy and mass psychology. Throughout the book, she treated Eichmann as the embodiment of individual culpability for the atrocities of a totalitarian regime.

She pointed out that Eichmann was not an ideological anti-Semite; he was simply trying to out-perform rivals and advance his career. Arendt noted that he was not psychopathic, psychologically damaged, or distorted by hatred. She coined the term “the banality of evil” to describe the way in which people who abdicate their own moral responsibility can become desensitized to the immoral duties they perform as a matter of daily life.

Eichmann had surrendered his moral autonomy by refusing to judge the laws or actions of the state he served, and so had the millions of other Germans who abetted the Nazi regime in general and the Holocaust in particular…

[In Full]

Related @ Technorati: 9/11, Adolf Eichmann, Affluence, al Qaeda, al-Qaeda, Alternative Education, Alternative News, American Culture, American History, Capitalism, Casualty Count, Children, Civilian Casualties, Class War, Cognitive Dissonance, Collateral Damage, Corporate Ethics, Corporatism, Corruption, Culture, Disinformation, Economic Sanctions, Education, Embargo, Ethics, Ethnic Cleansing, Ethnocide, Fascism, Genocide, Global Business, Global Empire, Global Hegemony, Global War On Terror, GWOT, Hannah Arendt, History, Human Rights, Hypocrisy, Imperialism, Iraq, Iraq War, Islamic Jihad, Islamophobia, Jihadi, Kleptocracy, Low Intensity Warfare, Massacre, Media Concentration, Middle Class, Middle East, Militarism, Myth, Occupation Army, Oil Wars, Osama bin-Laden, Pentagon, Philosophy, Political Dissent, Power Elite, Pre-Emptive Nation-Building, Preemptive War, Propaganda, Regime Change, Regional War, Resource Wars, Semantics, Social Issues, State Terror, Suicide Bomber, Symbolism, Teaching, Terrorism, U.S. Foreign Policy, UN Sanctions, US History, Vietnamization, War On Terror, War Pigs, Ward Churchill