'NCIS' Actresses Defended Michael Weatherly After His Sexual Harassment Scandal, And OMG, Can We Not?
Pauley Perrette and Sasha Alexander took to Twitter to support Weatherly following CBS's $9.5 million settlement with Eliza Dushku.
Just days after it came to light that Bull star Michael Weatherly exhibited abusive behavior towards actress Eliza Dushku on set, his former NCIS co-stars, Pauley Perrette and Sasha Alexander, have supported him on social media.
On Thursday, December 13, the New York Times released a report exposing the toxic culture at CBS. When Dushku joined the cast of Bull in 2017, the actress expressed concerns about Weatherly's behavior. She claimed he made inappropriate remarks about her appearance and propositioned her for sex.
Dushku reportedly confronted Weatherly, but the result wasn't what she expected: She was written off the show.
Dushku approached higher-ups to file a complaint, and CBS agreed to a settlement of $9.5 million (approximately what she would have made had she become a series regular). Weatherly later issued an apology and stated his remarks were meant to be humorous, but it doesn't take a genius to figure out Dushku was booted off the show because she spoke up.
Fast forward to today, when Weatherly's former NCIS co-stars — both women — publicly expressed support for the actor.
"This man. I love, respect, trust, and I know," Pauley Perrette wrote on Twitter. "Two decades of friendship and respect. The best. I love you @M_Weatherly. Always and forever."
Sasha Alexander also came to his defense.
"I have been in trenches with my friend @M_Weatherly," she wrote. "Always laughs, true friend, and as big as they come."
While Perrette and Alexander didn't directly address the scandal, the timing is suspect. The tweets fueled the notion that Dushku's allegations weren't accurate. But why would a network giant like CBS shell out millions of dollars if something wasn't seriously off? Mind you, Weatherly's inappropriate behavior was caught on tape. It was played during the mediation process, and as a result, the network coughed up $9.5 million in exchange for her silence.
What's the point of Perrette and Alexander coming to his defense if it isn't to help clear his name? Why are they choosing to stick up for a known harasser?
Let's get one thing straight: Just because someone hasn't displayed a certain behavior toward you doesn't mean they haven't displayed it toward others. You can spend years — even decades — working with a man who's been nothing but nice to you. That doesn't mean he treats everyone else the same way.
When you stick up for a man who cost a network millions because he couldn't act right, you're complicit in his abuse.