NIST 9/11 Report: Unscientific Mumbo Jumbo

Contributor: "Timmy Timbit"

Here's a recent video I came across from Kevin Ryan which explains in terms any layman of reasonable intelligence can understand why the final report of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on WTC 7's collapse on 9/11 is so much unscientific, non-peer-reviewed mumbo jumbo:

The NIST WTC 7 Report is False

Here's another video that pairs up well with Ryan's video and also looks at some of the glaringly illogical and unscientific aspects of NIST's investigatory methods and their final report on the WTC 7 collapse:

NIST: We Have the Results and Only We Have the Results

Kevin Ryan worked for Underwriters Laboratory, the agency responsible for certifying the steel used in the WTC construction met or exceeded all the required standards for strength, fire resistance etc. He was fired after he publicly questioned why UL refused to stand by its certification (which Ryan believes was legit) of the steel after NIST came out blaming the dramatic collapses of the WTC towers 1 & 2 on the heat-induced softening and loss of strength of the steel.
Comments
Advertisements
Zimbio Entertainment
Copyright © 2012 - Zimbio, Inc. Some rights reserved. Coming soon: Livingly
Share
. . .
Follow
. . .