

Already walking on real thin ice, after my good natured chiding of
Barack Obama
for not turning out to be everything gays and l
esbians had hoped for, and even
suggesting that his nonaction was largely responsible for the defeat of
Proposition 8, I am now about to take a dive which will likely result in no
muff dives for the foreseeable future....

But here goes...
eHarmony
has settled a suit brought by a
New Jersey man alleging that the matchmaking service discriminated against
homosexuals by operating a setup that did not extend searches to include partners of the same sex. A case brought by a
lesbian in
California
is still pending, but reports are
eHarmony is seeking an out of court resolution.
To say the least, our f
undie friends
are none to happy about this most recent capitulation in the culture war. And even though I am a culture war agnostic, I have to agree with them.

Why should
eHarmony be required to match up g
ays and
lesbians, anymore than
Planet Sappho has to find dates for
straight girls? And if I wanted to open up a hook up site for
gay gun-toting libertarian girls would I have to accept applications from all the
liberal dykes who can do nothing but huff
O-phoria all day long.
I just don't get it. Look, you don't go to a
Chinese joint if you have a craving for
Mexican chow. And should
Playboy be forced to have beefcake centerfolds? Does
Victoria'a Secret have to stock jock straps?

There are a multitude of
online gay dating services. If a
straight girl happened to stumble in looking for the man of her dreams, they would tell her to get lost—they just don't have anyone to match the chick up with. But, as far as I know, though I suppose it is bound to happen someday, no offended
straight girl has ever gotten all
Nanny Pants about it.

There are tons of sites specializing in hooking up people of all kinds of various tastes and interests—even
pot smokers. No one is suing them—but
gay activists can not help themselves.
At one level the concern about
eHarmony is absurd and ridiculous, but it also troubling.
If we are honest about it, the
social conservatives have not been very successful in imposing their narrow brand of
Christianity on the nation.
Abortion,
sodomy, and
pornography are now all
constitutional rights, and that same
constitution also prohibits
praying in
public schools.
Same sex marriage and
civil unions
are well on their way to becoming the law of the land, though they got a tiny temporary setback with
Proposition 8.

For the most part, other than these lost causes, all the
religious right wants is to be left alone, worship their god, homeschool and
spank their kids—and maintain their virginity until
eHarmoney selects a suitable mate.

These people are not really all that powerful. I can get
pornography on my laptop, and if I drive a couple miles I can purchase enough
sex toys
to fill the trunk of my car. If my daughter got pregnant the school, without notifying me, will arrange for an
abortion. However, if she takes an
Advil with her to
school
she will be expelled after first being strip searched.

Well-meaning
Liberals bullies are the real liberty
killers:
Seat belts, motorcycle helmets, bicycle helmets,smoking, car emission inspections, transfats, banning fast food restaurants, saying a prayer at a public school graduation, photo ID here, photo ID there, etc.—not to mention seizing a huge chunk of our hard earned wages.
More and more laws are being passed to
"protect" us…from…us. Roadblocks, checkpoints and random stops are now de rigueur here in the land of the free. Kinda reminiscent of
Nazi Germany. 
And that comparison is not over the top. One of the first wars against the ravages of tobacco
was waged by the
Third Reich.
Nazi Youth manuals proclaimed that "nutrition is not a private matter!"
But in
America we are fast forgetting what
freedom means. I guess a lot of people want the government
"experts" to take care of us--since we are all so stupid and helpless.
Its too bad-- for
liberty is found in the small joys of life

And now
liberal gay activists are demanding that the
government force
eHarmony to unite the
gays and
lesbians of
America because it is the right thing to do--even though no
gay or
lesbian will use the service.
eHarmony is a creepy fundie organization founded in 2000 by Evangelical Christian
Dr. Neil Clark Warren and had strong early ties with our friends at
Focus on the Family.

Why shouldn't
eHarmony have as much right as I do to start an
online dating service dedicated to pairing up
tomboys who live in their
daisy dyke short shorts?
However, I do console myself with the hope that the successful conclusion of these
lawsuits will somehow bring an end to the nauseating
Natalie Cole sing-along
eHarmony adverts.

Related Articles: